I already said it can't.
Barter doesn't disclose ignored members publicly. It only shows them members YOU ignore for instance, and not members who ignore you. Why is ridiculous because it still allows you to filter games against those who ignore you. And it does indicate the user is ignoring you, at that point. It's a half arsed implementation at best.

I could implement ignoring users manually here, but you still would see matches for people who ignore you.

It would be good to have that feature here then.

Yes Jeremy, it was a bug. I largely rewrote the header to be fixed (like in Barter), and I didn't test it enough.
After your post I kept modifying the code, so it may have broken at times, too.
I'm not 100% done, but I'm getting very close to what I was looking for.

Quote from Akylen on February 28th, 2017, 11:45 PM

It would be good to have that feature here then.

Let's just say that features that arbitrarily diminish the number of possible matches aren't going to be implemented unless there's a real userbase commitment to it.
I can't even enumerate all the people on Barter who added me to their ignore list without warning because I *argumented* how I valued a game in a trade. That isn't to say I said "My game is better you suck!", no, I said things like "It was bundled x times and lowest Steam price was recently y, so I think a 2:1 is more balanced than your 1:1". And voilà, I get ignored. I'd rather have a tool that allows people to counter that. For instance, notify people that they were put on an ignore list. They can then argue in public that the ignorer is an incompetent trader. Or possibly a better solution: keep an online track of everyone's ignore lists. If someone ignores many people who aren't ignored by many others, they might be flagged as 'quick shots' and as such demoted from trader reputation rankings.
Hmm yeah I like that idea.

In fact it's close in spirit to my plans to give everyone two rep systems: the completed offer rep (like Barter), and a trader reputation rep (possibly anonymous), which would allow one to rate someone's likeability (basically, a 'Recommended' rating.)
Site contributors (admin, host, moderators?) would probably be free from that rating, though, because they might be biased toward their site role rather than trader role.

You know, you don't have to use bold characters, it's likened to screaming. I hear you alright. I'm willing to listen since no one seems to have an interest in discussing anything on these forums... :-/ (At some point I even wondered if I hadn't broken some permissions.)

Ignore lists as implemented on LT (not active for now) last forever, and it would complicate the ui to make it possible to ignore for a limited time. Barter has a skip feature that does the same job, but people don't use it-- possibly because you can't view your current skips.
It would be technically feasible to ignore a combination of one game + one user, I.e. this user can no longer offer me anything for that game, or I don't want to see that game in their tradables because they're asking too much for it and I'd be wasting my time. But it's also complex to implement -- should I add an ignore button next to the game in the offer? Would need to educate users as to what it does, too.
It's just so annoying. Barter has a good system but its ignore lists really encourage shrinking your possibilities.

It's working for me, did you happen to post during the few minutes where I was rewriting the ratio code? :P